Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Economic Reform results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Overconfidence Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 340 hits. Analysis detected 3,260 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,664 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Economic Reform is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Economic Reform
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,664
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 12.8%12.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.4%4.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 8.6%8.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 5.3%5.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 10.4%10.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 12.8%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos