Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,193 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Recovery results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 571 hits. Analysis detected 3,517 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,772 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (10,250 of 16,562 topics). This Economic Recovery is better (less manipulative) than 61.90% of the peer group.
Economic Recovery
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠39%Economic Recovery (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 4,772
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510038.1% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.2%9.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 12.0%12.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.6%3.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.7%1.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.3%2.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 12.0%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.9%Special Pleading: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.3%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos