Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,681 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Projections results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Confirmation Bias , with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 856 hits . Analysis detected 4,239 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,724 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 4% (16,025 of 16,562 topics). This Economic Projections is better (less manipulative) than 96.80% of the peer group. Economic Projections
Topic details
Total words: 10,724
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.2% percentile 1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles10.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.4% False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst