Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,157 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Impact Of War results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 1,424 hits. Analysis detected 6,914 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,709 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (7,883 of 16,562 topics). This Economic Impact Of War is worse (more manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group.
Economic Impact Of War
Topic details
Total words: 7,709
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510052.4% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 10.3%10.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos