Topic summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video1,048 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Consequences results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Availability Heuristic, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.8% saturation with 748 hits. Analysis detected 3,588 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,144 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (4,046 of 16,562 topics). This Economic Consequences is worse (more manipulative) than 75.60% of the peer group.
Economic Consequences
Topic details
Total words: 3,144
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

76% percentile
025507510075.6% percentile
5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 15.9%15.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 10.7%10.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.7%10.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 23.8%23.8%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 23.8%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Topic 15.9%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.7%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Composition/Division: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos