Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos833 analyzed words
BS Summary: These East River results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 635 hits. Analysis detected 2,745 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,484 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (9,027 of 15,769 topics). This East River is better (less manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group.
East River
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,484
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510042.8% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 14.2%14.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.5%7.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos