Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video357 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Earnings Tax results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Slippery Slope, and Recency Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 149 hits. Analysis detected 962 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,428 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (8,842 of 16,562 topics). This Earnings Tax is better (less manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group.
Earnings Tax
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,428
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510046.6% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.4%10.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.5%8.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Special Pleading: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos