Topic summary
5% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,229 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eagles Training Camp results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 438 hits . Analysis detected 2,489 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,724 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 2% (15,398 of 15,689 topics). This Eagles Training Camp is better (less manipulative) than 98.10% of the peer group. Eagles Training Camp
Topic details
Total words: 7,724
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.9% percentile 1.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst