Topic summary
⁠64%1 analyzed article/video922 analyzed words
BS Summary: These E-Motos results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 407 hits. Analysis detected 3,171 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,688 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (10,656 of 23,003 topics). This E-Motos is worse (more manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group.
E-Motos
Topic details
Total words: 3,688
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510053.7% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.0%11.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.4%10.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.7%2.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Red Herring: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos