Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video456 analyzed words
BS Summary: These E Jean Carroll Lawsuit results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 331 hits. Analysis detected 2,156 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,824 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (4,319 of 16,562 topics). This E Jean Carroll Lawsuit is worse (more manipulative) than 73.90% of the peer group.
E Jean Carroll Lawsuit
Topic details
Total words: 1,824
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

74% percentile
025507510073.9% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 18.1%18.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.8%8.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.5%14.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.8%6.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Topic 4.3%4.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Special Pleading: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.3%Begging the Question: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%No True Scotsman: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.1%False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos