Topic summary
63% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,113 analyzed words
BS Summary: These E Bike Safety results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 672 hits . Analysis detected 3,608 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,880 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 55% (10,446 of 22,982 topics). This E Bike Safety is worse (more manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group. E Bike Safety
Topic details
Total words: 4,880
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.5% percentile 2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.8% 13.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Horn Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.0% Slippery Slope: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst