Topic summary
46%2 analyzed articles/videos580 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Drug Regulation results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 736 hits. Analysis detected 3,440 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,486 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (11,546 of 16,562 topics). This Drug Regulation is better (less manipulative) than 69.70% of the peer group.
Drug Regulation
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,486
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510030.3% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.4%16.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.2%13.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 7.7%7.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate