Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video586 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Drug Psa results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27% saturation with 632 hits. Analysis detected 2,717 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,344 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (3,684 of 16,562 topics). This Drug Psa is worse (more manipulative) than 77.80% of the peer group.
Drug Psa
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠78%Drug Psa (selected)6%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,344
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

78% percentile
025507510077.8% percentile
5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 27.0%27.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.6%10.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.7%8.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.3%15.3%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 27.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.2%Bandwagon: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos