Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video375 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Drug Interdiction Operations results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 46.1% saturation with 519 hits. Analysis detected 2,301 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,125 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (1,005 of 16,562 topics). This Drug Interdiction Operations is worse (more manipulative) than 93.90% of the peer group.
Drug Interdiction Operations
Topic details
Total words: 1,125
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

94% percentile
025507510093.9% percentile
11.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 46.1%46.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 22.8%22.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 27.1%27.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 20.9%20.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 13.6%13.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 10.1%10.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 25.3%25.3%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 46.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 27.1%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 25.3%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 22.8%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 20.9%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 3.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.1%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos