Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Driving Instruction results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Biased Writer Voice , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 120 hits . Analysis detected 662 faulty-reasoning hits from 880 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Driving Instruction is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Driving Instruction
Topic details
Total words: 880
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles880 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 13.6% 13.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.5% Red Herring: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst