Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video945 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Drink results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 765 hits. Analysis detected 2,703 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,780 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 43% (9,437 of 16,562 topics). This Drink is better (less manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group.
Drink
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,780
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510043.0% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 20.2%20.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 20.2%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.1%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos