Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 893 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dred Scott results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Slippery Slope , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 39.7% saturation with 1,419 hits . Analysis detected 7,242 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,572 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 80% (3,289 of 16,446 topics). This Dred Scott is worse (more manipulative) than 80.00% of the peer group. Dred Scott
Topic details
Total words: 3,572
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.0% percentile 5.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 39.7% 39.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Topic 18.6% 18.6% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 16.3% 16.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 39.7%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 19.5%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 19.2% Slippery Slope: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 1.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% Straw Man: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 0.9% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst