Topic summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video1,182 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Downsizing results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 611 hits. Analysis detected 4,446 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,546 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (4,871 of 16,562 topics). This Downsizing is worse (more manipulative) than 70.60% of the peer group.
Downsizing
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,546
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510070.6% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 17.2%17.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 14.4%14.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.3%10.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 11.6%11.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos