Author summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video1,182 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Local sponsor results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 611 hits. Analysis detected 4,446 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,546 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (1,396 of 6,366 authors). This Local sponsor is worse (more manipulative) than 78.10% of the peer group.
Local sponsor
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠79%Local sponsor (selected)5%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,546
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

78% percentile
025507510078.1% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.6%1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 17.2%17.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 14.4%14.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 10.3%10.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.5%4.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 11.6%11.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 17.2%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.3%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Author 14.4%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 11.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 10.3%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Author 5.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Loss Aversion: Author 5.2%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos