Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video366 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dow Jones results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 185 hits. Analysis detected 1,426 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,464 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ā 68% (5,339 of 16,321 topics). This Dow Jones is worse (more manipulative) than 67.30% of the peer group.
Dow Jones
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 68%Dow Jones (selected)5%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,464
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510067.3% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.6%12.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 9.0%9.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.5%4.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.0%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos