Topic summary
⁠55%2 analyzed articles/videos1,902 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Domestic Abuse results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 969 hits. Analysis detected 4,684 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,706 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (10,767 of 16,562 topics). This Domestic Abuse is better (less manipulative) than 65.00% of the peer group.
Domestic Abuse
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,706
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510035.0% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.9%8.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.9%4.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.0%7.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos