Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 716 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Doj Transparency results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 34.6% saturation with 743 hits . Analysis detected 5,119 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,148 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.7% and a BS Rank of 88% (2,024 of 16,562 topics). This Doj Transparency is worse (more manipulative) than 87.80% of the peer group. Doj Transparency
Topic details
Total words: 2,148
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.8% percentile 7.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 32.8% 32.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 34.6% 34.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 21.8% 21.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 13.3% 13.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 15.3% 15.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Topic 34.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 32.8%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 21.8%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 6.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 1.7% Halo Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.0% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.5% Red Herring: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst