Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Dividend Payments results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 4.8% saturation with 65 hits. Analysis detected 275 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Dividend Payments is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Dividend Payments
Topic details
Total words: 1,368
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 3.5%3.5%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 0.7%0.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos