Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,533 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diversity results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Optimism Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 856 hits. Analysis detected 4,806 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,216 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (14,879 of 15,142 topics). This Diversity is better (less manipulative) than 98.30% of the peer group.
Diversity
Topic details
Total words: 12,216
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

2% percentile
02550751001.7% percentile
1.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.1%0.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos