Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Disasters And Accidents results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 443 hits. Analysis detected 2,009 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,724 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Disasters And Accidents is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Disasters And Accidents
Topic details
Total words: 2,724
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.0%1.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 16.3%16.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 13.0%13.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.3%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos