Topic summary
28% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,632 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Disappearances results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 1,252 hits . Analysis detected 7,257 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,140 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 30% (10,829 of 15,447 topics). This Disappearances is better (less manipulative) than 70.10% of the peer group. Disappearances
Topic details
Total words: 9,140
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.9% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 13.7% 13.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst