Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Director Studies results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 1,066 hits. Analysis detected 5,219 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,446 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Director Studies is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Director Studies
Topic details
Total words: 7,446
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 14.3%14.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.5%12.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.7%3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Straw Man: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos