Topic summary
⁠8%1 analyzed article/video1,378 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diplomatic Pressure results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 218 hits. Analysis detected 1,617 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,134 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (13,912 of 16,562 topics). This Diplomatic Pressure is better (less manipulative) than 84.00% of the peer group.
Diplomatic Pressure
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠16%Diplomatic Pressure (selected)2%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 4,134
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

16% percentile
025507510016.0% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Middle Ground: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos