Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video822 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diplomatic Negotiations results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 419 hits. Analysis detected 3,437 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,288 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (6,353 of 16,562 topics). This Diplomatic Negotiations is worse (more manipulative) than 61.60% of the peer group.
Diplomatic Negotiations
Topic details
Total words: 3,288
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510061.6% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.7%12.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.5%11.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.9%2.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.5%4.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos