Topic summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,657 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diplomacy & Multilateralism results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Anecdotal , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 637 hits . Analysis detected 5,743 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,628 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of â 43% (9,517 of 16,562 topics). This Diplomacy & Multilateralism is better (less manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group. Diplomacy & Multilateralism
Topic details
Total words: 6,628
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.5% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 9.0% 9.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst