Topic summary
95% 6 analyzed articles/videos 6,809 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dining results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Halo Effect , and Indoctrination , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 32.9% saturation with 8,673 hits . Analysis detected 30,658 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,397 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 54% (7,735 of 16,562 topics). This Dining is worse (more manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group. Dining
Topic details
Total words: 26,397
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.3% percentile 3.1% BS Score6 analyzed articles26.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 32.9% 32.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.8% 10.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 32.9%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.0% Bandwagon: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst