Topic summary
95%6 analyzed articles/videos6,809 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dining results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and Indoctrination, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 32.9% saturation with 8,673 hits. Analysis detected 30,658 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,397 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 54% (7,735 of 16,562 topics). This Dining is worse (more manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group.
Dining
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 26,397
Article count: 6
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510053.3% percentile
3.1% BS Score6 analyzed articles26.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 32.9%32.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.8%10.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 32.9%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.0%Bandwagon: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateTopic rate