Topic summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,565 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dignity results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 1,706 hits . Analysis detected 12,299 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,260 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of â 41% (9,814 of 16,562 topics). This Dignity is better (less manipulative) than 59.30% of the peer group. Dignity
Topic details
Total words: 10,260
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.7% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles10.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 16.6% 16.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 13.8% 13.8% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Slippery Slope: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Straw Man: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst