Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,565 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dignity results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 1,706 hits. Analysis detected 12,299 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,260 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (9,814 of 16,562 topics). This Dignity is better (less manipulative) than 59.30% of the peer group.
Dignity
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠41%Dignity (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 10,260
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510040.7% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles10.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 16.6%16.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.9%8.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.8%13.8%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Straw Man: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos

The euthanasia of the West⁠64%
UnHerd⁠69%By Michel Houellebecq⁠0%7/3/2026, 4:04:21 PM