Topic summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video424 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Digital Markets results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Self-Serving Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 242 hits. Analysis detected 1,632 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,272 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (2,897 of 16,312 topics). This Digital Markets is worse (more manipulative) than 82.20% of the peer group.
Digital Markets
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,272
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

82% percentile
025507510082.2% percentile
6.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 12.5%12.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.7%10.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.0%19.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.8%6.8%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.0%6.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.9%8.9%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 4.0%4.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 19.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Red Herring: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos