Topic summary
⁠28%6 analyzed articles/videos7,029 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Digital Marketing results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 2,530 hits. Analysis detected 21,733 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,863 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠12% (14,717 of 16,562 topics). This Digital Marketing is better (less manipulative) than 88.90% of the peer group.
Digital Marketing
Topic details
Total words: 27,863
Article count: 6
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

11% percentile
025507510011.1% percentile
1.6% BS Score6 analyzed articles27.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.6%8.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 7.0%7.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 0.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos