Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video581 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Digital Humanities results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Optimism Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 192 hits. Analysis detected 1,352 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,324 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (7,006 of 15,447 topics). This Digital Humanities is worse (more manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group.
Digital Humanities
Topic details
Total words: 2,324
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510054.6% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.3%8.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.5%6.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 6.8%6.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 1.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Straw Man: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos