Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,041 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Digital Espionage results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 367 hits . Analysis detected 2,707 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,164 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (9,219 of 16,562 topics). This Digital Espionage is better (less manipulative) than 55.70% of the peer group. Digital Espionage
Topic details
Total words: 4,164
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.3% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Composition/Division: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst