Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,041 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Klepper results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 367 hits . Analysis detected 2,707 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,164 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 53% (3,118 of 6,628 authors). This David Klepper is worse (more manipulative) than 53.00% of the peer group. David Klepper
Author details
Total words: 4,164
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.0% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Composition/Division: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst