Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Digital Distraction results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 28.6% saturation with 96 hits. Analysis detected 232 faulty-reasoning hits from 336 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Digital Distraction is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Digital Distraction
Topic details
Total words: 336
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles336 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 28.6%28.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.1%13.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.0%11.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.0%6.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Topic 28.6%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos