Topic summary
⁠67%1 analyzed article/video1,013 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dietary Fiber results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Emotion, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 401 hits. Analysis detected 4,246 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,052 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (6,994 of 16,562 topics). This Dietary Fiber is worse (more manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group.
Dietary Fiber
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,052
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510057.8% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 9.9%9.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 9.3%9.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 8.5%8.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 8.5%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Red Herring: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.2%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos