Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 113 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Die Hard Debate results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Bandwagon , Anchoring Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 27.7% saturation with 94 hits . Analysis detected 795 faulty-reasoning hits from 339 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.8% and a BS Rank of 92% (1,349 of 16,562 topics). This Die Hard Debate is worse (more manipulative) than 91.90% of the peer group. Die Hard Debate
Topic details
Total words: 339
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
92% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 91.9% percentile 9.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles339 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Topic 20.4% 20.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 18.9% 18.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.1% 7.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 17.4% 17.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 18.0% 18.0% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Topic 10.6% 10.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 15.6% 15.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 11.2% 11.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 27.7%, sitewide 26.9% Bandwagon: Topic 20.4%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 19.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 18.9%, sitewide 4.0% Confirmation Bias: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 3.1% Primacy Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.7%, sitewide 0.8% Anecdotal: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.5% Middle Ground: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.1% Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.2% Composition/Division: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.2% Red Herring: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.7% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst