Topic summary
24% 1 analyzed article/video 471 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dhaka results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 203 hits . Analysis detected 769 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,413 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 55% (7,308 of 15,949 topics). This Dhaka is worse (more manipulative) than 54.20% of the peer group. Dhaka
Topic details
Total words: 1,413
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.2% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 14.4% 14.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.6% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst