Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 260 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Developing Story results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 53.5% saturation with 417 hits . Analysis detected 2,134 faulty-reasoning hits from 780 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.7% and a BS Rank of 96% (669 of 16,150 topics). This Developing Story is worse (more manipulative) than 95.90% of the peer group. Developing Story
Topic details
Total words: 780
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
96% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 95.9% percentile 13.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles780 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 53.5% 53.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 38.6% 38.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 21.5% 21.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 23.9% 23.9% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Topic 16.7% 16.7% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 15.4% 15.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 13.7% 13.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 36.1% 36.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 9.1% 9.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Negativity Bias: Topic 53.5%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Topic 38.6%, sitewide 9.1% Framing Effect: Topic 36.1%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 23.9%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Topic 21.5%, sitewide 5.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 4.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.5%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Horn Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.0% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst