Topic summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,318 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Detroit Lions results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Recency Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.1% saturation with 1,031 hits . Analysis detected 9,482 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,954 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of 84% (2,790 of 16,562 topics). This Detroit Lions is worse (more manipulative) than 83.20% of the peer group. Detroit Lions
Topic details
Total words: 3,954
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.2% percentile 6.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 17.8% 17.8% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 10.8% 10.8% Special Pleading Sitewide 0.3% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 14.4% 14.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 26.1% 26.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 20.9% 20.9% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 20.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 26.1%, sitewide 19.2% Recency Bias: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hindsight Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 4.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 4.6% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Special Pleading: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 0.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.3%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.5% Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst