Topic summary
⁠20%1 analyzed article/video1,367 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Desktop Environments results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Overconfidence Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 322 hits. Analysis detected 2,330 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,101 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (10,199 of 16,562 topics). This Desktop Environments is better (less manipulative) than 61.60% of the peer group.
Desktop Environments
Topic details
Total words: 4,101
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510038.4% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.8%7.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 7.7%7.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos