Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Designer Fashion results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Halo Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 342 hits. Analysis detected 2,242 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,244 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Designer Fashion is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Designer Fashion
Topic details
Total words: 3,244
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.5%10.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos