Topic summary
100% 1 analyzed article/video 210 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Derivatives Trading results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 42.5% saturation with 357 hits . Analysis detected 3,345 faulty-reasoning hits from 840 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 18.1% and a BS Rank of 99% (302 of 16,562 topics). This Derivatives Trading is worse (more manipulative) than 98.20% of the peer group. Derivatives Trading
Topic details
Total words: 840
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
98% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 98.2% percentile 18.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles840 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 42.5% 42.5% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 34.3% 34.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 36.1% 36.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 34.6% 34.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 26.1% 26.1% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Topic 17.9% 17.9% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Topic 17.9% 17.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 25.0% 25.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.1% 11.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 35.0% 35.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Recency Bias: Topic 42.5%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 36.1%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Topic 35.0%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 34.6%, sitewide 8.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 34.3%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 26.1%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 25.0%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 19.6%, sitewide 4.6% Composition/Division: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 17.5%, sitewide 4.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 8.9%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.6%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 1.1% Halo Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.2% Primacy Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.9% Recency Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst