Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Department Of Investigation results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 229 hits. Analysis detected 1,273 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,156 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Department Of Investigation is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Department Of Investigation
Topic details
Total words: 2,156
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.6%10.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.3%9.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 4.4%4.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos