Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video1,352 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Department Of Health And Human Services results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 25% saturation with 1,353 hits. Analysis detected 6,230 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,408 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ā 57% (7,225 of 16,562 topics). This Department Of Health And Human Services is worse (more manipulative) than 56.40% of the peer group.
Department Of Health And Human Services
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 57%Department Of Health And Human Services (selected)4%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 5,408
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510056.4% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.8%12.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.7%11.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Politically Left Leaning ā€¦Sitewide 2.0%Topic 5.3%5.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 25.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos