Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Democratic Party Primaries results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.6% saturation with 474 hits. Analysis detected 1,720 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,196 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,559 topics). This Democratic Party Primaries is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Democratic Party Primaries
Topic details
Total words: 2,196
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.3%9.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 21.6%21.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 21.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos