Topic summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video2,289 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Democracy Promotion results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.7% saturation with 1,896 hits. Analysis detected 9,116 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,156 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (10,079 of 20,972 topics). This Democracy Promotion is worse (more manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group.
Democracy Promotion
Topic details
Total words: 9,156
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510051.9% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.4%15.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 20.7%20.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 13.2%13.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 20.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos